Written in EnglishRead online
Includes bibliographical references and index.
|Statement||by Christopher Norris.|
|Series||Oklahoma project for discourse and theory ;, v. 4|
|LC Classifications||PN98.D43 N59 1989|
|The Physical Object|
|Pagination||250 p. ;|
|Number of Pages||250|
|LC Control Number||88040546|
Download Deconstruction and the interests of theory
Deconstruction and the Interests of Theory (Oklahoma Project for Discourse & Theory) [Norris, Christopher] on *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Deconstruction and the Interests of Theory (Oklahoma Project for Discourse & Theory)Author: Christopher Norris.
After Derrida, check out Paul de Man. Also, check out The Critical Tradition: Classic Texts and Contemporary Trends,Seven Types of Ambiguity,Theory of Literature (The Open Yale Courses Series),Critical Theory Today: A User-Friendly Guide,The Pleasures of Reading Cited by: Deconstruction: Theory and Practice has been acclaimed as by far the most readable, concise and authoritative guide to this topic.
Without oversimplifying or glossing over the challenges, Norris makes deconstruction more accessible to the reader/5.
ISBN: OCLC Number: Description: pages ; 24 cm. Contents: Introduction: on the uses and abuses of literary theory Utopian deconstruction: Ernst Bloch, Paul de Man and the politics of music Reading Donald Davidson: truth, meaning and right interpretation Pope among the formalists: sexual politics and 'The Rape of the Lock' Additional Physical Format: Online version: Norris, Christopher, Deconstruction and the interests of theory.
London: Pinter, (OCoLC) texts All Books All Texts latest This Just In Smithsonian Libraries FEDLINK (US) Genealogy Lincoln Collection. National Emergency Library.
Top Deconstruction and the interests of theory by Norris, Christopher. Publication date Topics Deconstruction Publisher London: Pinter CollectionPages: deconstruction, in linguistics, philosophy, and literary theory, the exposure and undermining of the metaphysical assumptions involved in systematic attempts to ground knowledge, especially in academic disciplines such as structuralism and semiotics.
On Deconstruction is both an authoritative synthesis of Derrida's thought and an analysis of the often-problematic relation between his philosophical writings and the work of literary critics. Deconstruction is a poststructuralist theory, based largely but not exclusively on the writings of Derrida.
It is in the first instance a philosophical theory and a theory directed towards the (re)reading of philosophical writings.
Its impact on literature, mediated in North America largely through the. The Deconstruction Theory of Derrida and Heidegger – A Study - Chung Chin-Yi In this paper I will discuss Heidegger's destruction and Derrida's critique of it in his deconstruction.
I will read destruction in various Heidegger texts and discuss Derrida's intervention through his critique of destruction in deconstruction.
As Ward says, “Deconstruction is a [literary] method of reading which effectively turns texts against themselves.” 1 For example, according to Derrida’s theory of deconstruction, the Bible is merely a book written by men who were locked in Deconstruction and the interests of theory book own culture, experiences, and language.
Deconstruction and Critical Theory marks a new stage in the reception history of Derrida's work and in the wider philosophical debate around deconstruction.
Zima's study makes a strikingly original contribution to our better understanding of deconstruction and its various philosophic sources. Christopher Norris, University of Wales at Cardiff. This Bible of postcolonial theory also includes lots of interesting engagements with Derrida's work.
Spivak's writing isn't for the faint of heart, it's true. But if you want to see how Deconstruct. For a good discussion of the difference between Derrida's orginal interests and the interests of his English-speaking followers, see Grumbrecht, 'Deconstruction deconstructed'. For the claim that deconstruction should not have been extended from metaphysics to literature, that it was a mistake to have taken 'a legitimate philosophical practice.
Derrida has raised one term called deconstruction. This term can be understood as a theory and method of reading and analytic inquiry that aims to undermine the logic of opposition within texts [5 Author: Noel Gough. Originated by the philosopher Jacques Derrida, deconstruction is an approach to understanding the relationship between text and meaning.
Derrida's approach consisted of conducting readings of texts looking for things that run counter to the intended meaning or structural unity of a particular text. Book Description. Deconstruction: Theory and Practice has been acclaimed as by far the most readable, concise and authoritative guide to this topic.
Without oversimplifying or glossing over the challenges, Norris makes deconstruction more accessible to the reader. The volume focuses on the works of Jacques Derrida which caused this seismic.
The book demonstrates that the logic of deconstruction is resourceful and rigorous in its questioning of the presuppositions of prevailing IR approaches, and argues that relying on deconstruction leads to richer and more powerfully insightful pluralist IR theories and is an invaluable resource for taking IR theory beyond currently paralyzing.
Deconstructive Theory Definition; "Deconstruction is a form of semiotic analysis, derived mainly from French Philosopher Jacques Derrida." To some extent all moving image distorts reality whilst you are watching them.
Rather than destroying reality altogether they just. the way literary theory positions itself in relation to analytic philosophy of crucial moment in the enterprise of anglophone deconstruction.
Christopher Norris's The Deconstructive Turn squarely addresses this issue, opening with the question that the book is meant to answer. "What might be.
Deconstruction: Theory and Practice has been acclaimed as by far the most readable, concise and authoritative guide to this topic. Without oversimplifying or glossing over the challenges, Norris makes deconstruction more accessible to the reader.
The volume focuses on the works of Jacques Derrida which caused this seismic shift in critical thought, as well as the work of North. In the United States, the Critical Legal Studies movement applied deconstruction to legal writing in an effort to reveal conflicts between principles and counterprinciples in legal theory.
The movement explored fundamental oppositions such as public and private. For Anglophone readers who view deconstruction as a set of arguments about language and literature or see Derrida’s early s exploration of Marxism as weak and belated, Theory.
Deconstruction is an apparent revolution against all the literary theories before itself which vouch for a unity in the literary texts. It seeks to find the differences, contradictions, paradoxes, ambiguity and disintegration (in short, loopholes) in the text.
Deconstruction basically aims at proving that a literary text is not certainly. The purpose of this book, first published inis to call attention to the contrast between the remarkable politicization of the rhetoric of literary criticism and the scarcity of interest in the concrete historical and political contexts of literary texts.
Books shelved as derrida-and-deconstruction: Spurs: Nietzsche's Styles/Éperons: Les Styles de Nietzsche by Jacques Derrida, Speech and Phenomena and Othe.
Deconstruction is having a moment. There are podcasts and books galore about the process of deconstructing (usually damaging or negative) religious belief. Take one step back from deconstruction and you have the phenomenon of doubt in modern Christian writing.
At some point in the last ten years, doubt began to be the prerequisite for an [ ]. Deconstruction: School of philosophy and literary criticism forged in the writings of the French philosopher Jacques Derrida and the Belgium/North American literary critic Paul De Man.
Deconstruction can perhaps best be described as a theory of reading which aims to undermine the logic of opposition within texts. His interests and publications encompass the methodologies of literary science, postmodernism, magic realism, theory of the novel, literary hermeneutics, world literature, contemporary Slovenian literature, and ethical literary criticism.
He has produced fifteen books on these topics so far and more than hundred scientific articles. (Degenaar ) Deconstruction, a theory about language and literature, was developed in the s, in large part as a reaction to the primacy of French structuralism and a repressive academic and intellectual system that rigidly administered a unique and definitive interpretation of literary by: 2.
of theory construction and scientiﬁc discovery, interests. this book revolutionized contemporary thinking on science and knowledge. Ideas such as the now legendary doctrine of.
Question: "Deconstructionism - is it a valid way to interpret the Bible?" Answer: Deconstructionism is basically a theory of textual criticism or interpretation that denies there is any single correct meaning or interpretation of a passage or text.
At the heart of the deconstructionist theory of interpretation are two primary ideas. Deconstruction got started in France, where the Algerian-born Derrida began blowing people's minds in the sixties. He had those razor-sharp reading skills, some insane book sma. There's a collection of essays called Deconstruction and Criticism that features Bloom (not really a deconstructionist), Paul de Man, Jacques Derrida, Geoffrey Hartman, and J.
Hillis Miller. All the articles, save perhaps Bloom, perform deconstructive readings of a text. However, be warned, this is not an introduction to deconstruction, and the language used is very esoteric and the arguments.
Kamuf's principal research interests are in literary theory and contemporary French thought and literature. She has written extensively on the work of Jacques Derrida, Hélène Cixous, and Jean-Luc Nancy, and she has also translated a number of their texts.
Reading Deconstruction / Deconstructive Reading offers a unique, informed, and badly needed introduction to this important movement, written by one of its most sensitive and lucid practitioners.
More than an introduction, this book makes a significant addition to the current debate in critical by: The book demonstrates that the logic of deconstruction is resourceful and rigorous in its questioning of the presuppositions of prevailing IR approaches, and argues that relying on deconstruction leads to richer and more powerfully insightful pluralist IR theories and is an invaluable resource for taking IR theory beyond currently paralyzing Cited by: 4.
Deconstruction, like critical strategies based on Marxism, feminism, semiotics, and anthropology, focuses not on the themes and imagery of its objects but rather on the linguistic and institutional systems that frame the production of texts.
In Derrida’s theory, deconstruction asks how representation inhabits reality. Part epistemology, part linguistics, and part microeconomic theory, the book is a veritable textbook for the Humanities and a handy reference for the libertarian and conservative intellectual.
Deconstruction is best examined through the lens of microeconomic rationalism, since Derrida's theory is at base a literary incarnation of Vilfredo.
Introduction to Deconstruction and in future books that will appear in this series. First, the books are in no way shortcuts to in-depth. knowledge of any field. Rather, these straightforward treatments are.
growth of interest in rhetoric and composition theory, fields whose. It is influenced by the theory of "Deconstruction". It is characterized by fragmentation, and interest in manipulating a structure's surface or skin through transform the basic Volumes of architecture (Cube, Cuboid, Pyramid & sphere) in order to recombine it in a new hybrid shapes.Deconstruction is a way of understanding how something was created, usually things like art, books, poems and other writing.
Deconstruction is breaking something down into smaller parts. Deconstruction looks at the smaller parts that were used to create an .The book will undoubtedly be of great interest not only to students of deconstruction but also - and especially - to those whose primary focus is its critical bearing on topics in ethics, law, political theory, international relations, and modern intellectual history.
Altogether a notable and exceptionally well-conceived volume.".